Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the chainpress domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/cryptogazzete/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

WordPress database error: [Table 'cryptogazzete_db.wp_1_term_relationships' doesn't exist]
SELECT DISTINCT t.term_id, tr.object_id FROM wp_1_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_1_term_taxonomy AS tt ON t.term_id = tt.term_id INNER JOIN wp_1_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag', 'post_format') AND tr.object_id IN (17437) ORDER BY t.name ASC

The SEC Rejects More Bitcoin ETFs From ProShares, GraniteShares, And Direxion – CryptoGazette

Another bad news for the Bitcoin ETFs: the US Securities and Exchange Commission rejected two more ETF proposals filed by ProShares. The company has around $30 billion in assets under management and filed with the SEC back in September.

The exchange-traded funds would have tracked BTC futures traded on the Chicago Board of Options Exchange and traded on NYSE Arca.

The reasons provided for rejecting ProShares’ proposals

The SEC explains that the order disapproves the proposed rule change. They said that even if they disapproved the proposed rule change, they also highlight that the “disapproval does not rest on an evaluation of whether Bitcoin or blockchain technology more generally, has utility or value as an innovation or an investment.”

The SEC continues and explains that “The Commission is disapproving this proposed rule change because, as discussed below, the Exchange has not met its burden under the Exchange Act and the Commission’s Rules of Practice to demonstrate that its proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act Section 6, in particular, the requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices.”

The SEC said that the Exchange did not record evidence to prove that Bitcoin futures markets have a significant size and they claim that this failure is severe because the Exchange failed to establish that other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices will be enough.

You can read the full document that explains the rejection here.

ETF proposals from GraniteShares and Direxion also rejected

The SEC also rejected the proposals coming from Direxion and GraniteShares for quite similar reasons.

Exchange-traded funds track an index or group of assets just like stocks do, but it seems that they are also viewed as having the potential to bring a crush of institutional investors into the cryptosphere.

These rejections come after a similar denial last month when the SEC also rejected the proposal filed by the Gemini founders.

Now, everyone will be waiting to see what happens to the VanEck/SolidX Bitcoin ETF. This one got delayed, and it’s set to be approved or denied on September 30.

Leave a Comment