# Treasury Secretary Bessent Reiterates “No CBDC” Commitment Under Trump Administration
United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has once again confirmed that the Trump administration has no intention of pursuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), reinforcing the White House’s position that Americans should retain access to private-sector digital assets rather than a government-controlled digital dollar.
Speaking on Wednesday, Bessent made clear that the administration’s stance on CBDCs has not softened, even as other major economies including China and the European Union continue to develop their own state-issued digital currencies. His remarks signal that the U.S. will not follow the global trend toward government-issued digital money under the current administration.
## Bessent Draws a Line in the Sand on CBDCs
The Treasury Secretary’s latest statement comes as part of a broader push by the Trump administration to distance itself from CBDC development. Bessent emphasized that a digital dollar controlled by the federal government would give Washington unprecedented oversight over Americans’ financial transactions.
“No CBDC. That commitment stands and it will not change,” Bessent said during his remarks. The Treasury Secretary argued that a government-issued digital currency would represent an overreach into the financial privacy of ordinary Americans.
This position aligns with executive orders signed earlier in the Trump term that explicitly barred federal agencies from pursuing CBDC development. The administration has instead focused on creating regulatory clarity for stablecoins and private-sector crypto innovation.
## Contrast With Global CBDC Momentum
The U.S. position stands in stark contrast to the trajectory of CBDC development worldwide. China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) continues to expand its pilot program, now reaching over 260 million individual wallets. The European Central Bank is pushing ahead with its digital euro project, targeting a potential launch by 2028.
According to the Atlantic Council’s CBDC tracker, 130 countries representing 98% of global GDP are currently exploring CBDCs in some form. Yet the United States, under the Trump administration, has chosen to swim against the tide.
Instead of a CBDC, the administration has championed a regulatory framework that encourages private-sector innovation in stablecoins and dollar-backed digital assets. Treasury officials have argued that regulated stablecoins can deliver many of the same benefits as a CBDC — faster payments, financial inclusion, and programmability — without the privacy concerns of a government-controlled ledger.
## Market Reaction
Crypto markets have reacted positively to the continued anti-CBDC stance, with market participants interpreting it as a signal that the administration remains firmly pro-crypto. Bitcoin is currently trading around $73,600, while the broader crypto market shows signs of stabilization after recent volatility tied to geopolitical tensions.
Industry advocates have praised the administration’s approach. The Blockchain Association noted that “the U.S. is sending a clear message that it will not sacrifice financial privacy under the guise of technological progress.”
## What This Means for Crypto
For crypto investors and industry participants, Bessent’s reaffirmation removes a significant regulatory overhang. The fear that the U.S. government might one day launch its own digital currency that could compete with or crowd out private cryptocurrencies has been a recurring concern in Washington policy debates.
By taking CBDCs off the table, the administration has effectively signaled that it views cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as the future of digital payments — not a government-issued alternative.
## FAQ
**What is a CBDC and why does it matter for crypto?**
A Central Bank Digital Currency is a digital form of a country’s fiat currency issued and controlled by its central bank. Unlike cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, CBDCs are centralized and give governments direct oversight over transactions. The crypto industry generally opposes CBDCs, viewing them as a threat to financial privacy and competition from state-backed digital money.
**Has the U.S. completely banned CBDC development?**
Executive orders under the Trump administration have directed federal agencies to halt any CBDC work. While legislation would be needed to permanently ban CBDCs, the administration has consistently opposed their development through executive action.
**Could a future administration reverse the no-CBDC policy?**
Yes, a future administration could reverse the policy. However, any attempt to launch a U.S. CBDC would require significant legislative and regulatory groundwork, making it unlikely to happen quickly even under a change in administration.
—
*Sources: The Block, Treasury Department press briefing, Atlantic Council CBDC Tracker*
